I wish to thank all of the individuals who have encouraged this
project. I am especially grateful to D. Alan Diefenbach, Robert L.
Oakley, Madeline C. Oakley, and Marie Whited for their invaluable
criticism and advice; Margaret Bailey for her assistance in
organization; and, of course, to Mr. Harry Bitner for the
inspiration and example that he continues to offer young
librarians.
Federal Impeachment is designed to reach the most powerful
public officials and to protect our institutions of government. It
is one remedy that is available in order that the body politic may
express its intolerance for such abrogation of duty, misconduct,
or violation of some public trust, that may have been committed by
the President, Vice President, or any Civil Officer of the United
States.
It is clear that Impeachment is a political process more than a legal one. It is
characterized by political possibilities rather than the clearly measured principles and
remedies of law. Our Constitution provides only the authority for Impeachment. It has left
the question as to what may be an impeachable offense to the Congress, to the people. The
Impeachment process, then, especially when it involves the President of the United States,
deeply involves us all.
What is provided in this compilation is a cogent path through the most important
components of this process. Attention has been given to the historical development of
Impeachment, the complex procedure that has evolved, the nature of an impeachable offense
as revealed through specific English and American cases of Impeachment, and the various
discussions of Impeachment by legal scholars and historians. This is the material that
continues to be cited in practically every discussion of Impeachment, whether it be
through monograph, journal article, government report, or newspaper editorial. Lawyers,
government officials, and historians who have been most directly involved with the Federal
Impeachment process, whether through actual cases or scholarly interest, would consider
this material to be the most important.
Practically all of the following items are available in Cornell University Libraries,
and especially, in the Cornell Law Library. The various call numbers have been provided,
as well as the means whereby additional information may be accessed.
It is felt that this compilation will be
of significant value to undergraduates, graduates, teachers,
lawyers, and to the general public.
The updater has tried to keep as much of the original work and format as possible.
Since the original included information on impeachment at a time leading up to President
Nixon's resignation, many of the items noted
in the supplementary literature may not be readily available. The
review of the literature is divided into two parts, dividing it by
its chronological relation to Watergate (1974 and before; after
1974). Some of the articles after 1974 may concentrate more on
analysis of the issues surrounding the separation of powers
clause, or special prosecutors, which have often entered into
scholarly considerations of impeachment. Two small sections have
been added. One section notes important cases, the other includes
Internet sites of possible interest to researchers.
The verb impeach, derived from the French, empêcher, literally means to prevent or
hinder; also, to accuse, to impute some fault or defect to. An act of impeachment would
entail a "calling in question or discrediting as purity of motives, rectitude of
conduct, credibility, etc." Cf. WEBSTER'S 3d NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY OF THE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE 1961.
In the realm of evidence, impeachment might involve the calling into question the
veracity of a particular witness. But it is also used to denote a criminal proceeding, or
process, brought against a public officer, instituted by a written accusation (i.e.,
"Articles of Impeachment"), and before a competent tribunal. In England, it is
the privilege of the House of Commons to impeach, and the right of the House of Lords to
determine impeachment. In the United States, the former is vested in the House of
Representatives, while the responsibility of Judgment rests with the Senate. Cf. BLACK'S
LAW DICTIONARY. 6th ed., St. Paul, West, 1990 LAW KF 156 B62 1990
ENGLISH LAW IMPEACHMENT PRECEDENTSAND THE EVOLUTION OF THE UNITED
STATES IMPEACHMENT PROVISIONS
Holdsworth, Sir William Searle. A HISTORY OF ENGLISH LAW. 17 Vols., London,
Methuen, 1903-66.
This edition is thoroughly indexed, for Impeachment, generally, consult Vol. 17,
General Index, p. 254. See especially, Vol. pp. 379-383: " the Jurisdiction Now
Existing," " the Origin of Impeachments," " the Constitutional
Importance of Impeachments," and " the Disuse of Impeachments." KF536.H72
H4.
THE DIGEST: ANNOTATED BRITISH, COMMONWEALTH AND EUROPEAN CASES. 48 Vols., London,
Butterworth, 1990.
For references and annotations to actual cases of Parliamentary Impeachment, and where
these cases are reported, consult Vol. 36(2), p. 220 (notes 1698-1714). KD296.E52.
Blackstone, Sir William. COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND. 4 Vols., Boston, Beacon
Press, 1962. Consult Vol. 4, "Of Misprisions and Contempts Affecting the Sovereign
and Government," Ch. IX; "Of Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction," Ch. XIX;
"Trial by High Courts of Parliament," Ch. XVII, Sect. IV. LAW KD 600 B63 1962.
Hatsell, John. PRECEDENTS OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 4 Vols., London, Luke
Hansard, 1818. See especially, Vol. 4, "Relating to Conference and Impeachment,"
pp. 56-487.
LAW Inquire at Reference Desk.
Russell, Sir William. RUSSELL ON CRIME. 2 Vols., London, Stevens, 1958
This treatise was originally published in 1819, under the title: A TREATISE ON CRIMES
AND MISDEMEANORS. LAW Inquire reference Desk.
Farrand, Max. Ed. THE RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION OF 1787. 4 Vols., New
Haven, Yale University Press, 1937. The Index in Vol. 4 affords comprehensive treatment of
Impeachment as discussed during the Convention. All of the various plans for an
Impeachment clause, as well as the provisions for the establishment of a federal judiciary
and judicial tenure, are easily accessed (Cf. commentary by William Mason, James Madison,
Gouverneur Morris, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin.) It may be of special
interest to trace the impeachment provision from the date of its original phrasing on July
20 ("...to be removable on impeachment and conviction for malpractice or neglect of
duty," Vol. II, p. 64), to the final version accepted on September 8 (Vol. II, p.
550). LAW KF 4510 1911 and 1937 (Index Volume).
Koch, Adrienne, Ed., NOTES OF DEBATES IN THE FEDERAL CONVENTION OF 1787, REPORTED BY
JAMES MADISON. Athens, Ohio, Ohio University Press, 1966. Unfortunately, this text is
without an index. However, entries noted on the following pages may prove helpful: 331,
334-5, 383, 386, 392-3, 574, 579, 605-6. Another way in which to locate Madison's notes on
Impeachment is to consult the corresponding date of entry as indicated in the FARRAND
edition, noted above. LAW KF 4513 U58.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison and John Jay. THE FEDERALIST. Cambridge, Mass.,
Belknap Press, 1966. See especially the following numbers by James Madison: 44, 48, 51;
and by Alexander Hamilton: 65, 78. LAW KF 4515 F29 1966a.
E11iot, Jonathan. DEBATES IN THE SEVERAL STATE CONVENTIONS ON THE ADOPTION OF THE
FEDERAL CONSTITUTION. 5 Vols., Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott, 1896. LAW KF 4510 E46 1896.
Storey, Joseph. COMMENTARIES ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. 5th ed., 2
Vols., Boston, Little, Brown, 1891. LAW KF 4528 S88 1891.
The House of Representatives shall chuse [sic] their Speaker and other Officers; and
shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." ARTICLE I, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 5.
"The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for
the Purpose, they shall be on Oath. When the President of the United States is tried, the
Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be Convicted without the Concurrence of
two thirds of the Members present." ARTICLE I, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 6.
"Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from
Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of Honor, Trust, or Profit under
the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to
Indictment, Trial, Judgement, and Punishment, according to Law." ARTICLE I, SECTION
3, CLAUSE 7.
"[The President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences
against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." ARTICLE II, SECTION 2,
CLAUSE 1.
ARTICLE II, SECTION 4.
"The Judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court,
and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good
Behavior...
ARTICLE III, SECTION 1.
"...the Trial of all crimes, except in cases of Impeachment, shall be by
jury."
ARTICLE III, SECTION 2.
There are numerous editions of the Constitution of the United States. Certainly one of
the most worthy is THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION, Library of Congress ea., Washington, Government Printing Office, 1996.
This text is complete with case annotations, analysis and comment.
Updates beyond 1996 may be accomplished through one of the annotated codes, e.g., in
the CONSTITUTION volumes of the UNITED STATES CODE ANNOTATED. St. Paul, West, 1968.
IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURE
Part I: Basic Procedure and Precedent
The following references are to volume and section of HINDS '-CANNON 'S PRECEDENTS OF
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, op. cit., "DOCUMENTARY SOURCES". Each of the
Impeachment Procedures herein discussed is presented in conjunction with a particular case
of Impeachment.
INITIATION OF IMPEACHMENT.
III: 2050, 2051, 2053, 2294, 2319, 2342, 2364, 2400, 2469, 2486, 2487, 2491, 2494,
2496, 2499, 2515;
VI: 470.
INVESTIGATION OF CHARGES.
III: 1741, 2319, 2342, 2343, 2365, 2376, 2403, 2445, 2471, 2499, 2514, 2516, 2517,
2519;
VI: 499.
IMPEACHMENT VOTED.
The form of the Impeachment Resolution has varied from case to case. Generally, it is
submitted thus: "Will the House adopt the articles, as its articles of impeachment,
against------------------, -----------."
X: 496-497.
This volume is the INDEX-DIGEST: Cf. p. 496 (80) "Articles of
Impeachment.Consideration in House or Committee of the Whole.''
SELECTION OF MANAGERS.
III: 2031, 2300, 2323, 2345, 2368, 2388, 2417, 2448, 2475.
FOLLOWING IMPEACHMENT, SENATE NOTIFIED BY MESSAGE.
III: 2413, 1446.
HOUSE NOTIFIED THAT SENATE IS READY TO RECEIVE ARTICLES.
III: 2078, 2235, 2345.
MANAGERS PRESENT ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO SENATE.
III: 2126, 2296, 2302, 2343, 2367, 2370, 2390, 2413, 2420, 2446, 2449, 2473.
MANAGERS REPORT TO HOUSE THE PRESENTMENT OF THE ARTICLES.
III: 2296, 2343, 2413, 2446.
SENATE NOTIFIES HOUSE IT IS ORGANIZED FOR TRIAL.
VI: 502
APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENT.
III: 2127, 2307, 2333, 2349, 2393, 2424.
ANSWERS OF RESPONDENT.
III: 2124, 2310, 2453.
REPLICATION OF HOUSE.
III: 2455.
VI: 506
ATTENDANCE OF HOUSE AT TRIAL.
III: 2354, 2483.
TRIAL PROCEDURE.
III. 2055.
JUDGMENT.
III. 2098.
A comprehensive index and digest to Impeachment can be consulted at X HINDS'-CANNON'S
458 et seq. LAW KF 4992 H66 1935 B.C.
Part II: Additional Material on Impeachment Procedure
Cannon, Clarence.' CANNON'S PROCEDURE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Washington,
Government Printing Office, 1939. Cf. "Precedence," Section viii. LAW KF 4992
C22 1939 B.C.
House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, 93d Congress, 2d Session,
January, 1974. OLIN KF 5075 A81 I3 1974.
JEFFERSON'S MANUAL AND RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. House of Representatives,
102nd Congress, 2d Session, (House Doc. 405) 1992. LAW KF 34.
SENATE MANUAL CONTAINING STANDING RULES, ORDERS, LAWS, AND RESOLUTIONS AFFECTING THE
BUSINESS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE. Sen. Doc. 101-1 (1992).
LAW KF 34.
RIDDICK'S SENATE PROCEDURE, Revd. and edited
by Alan S. Frumin, Sen. Doc No. 101-28 (1992).
Bates, William. "Vagueness in the Constitution: The Impeachment Power," 25
STANFORD LAW REVIEW 908 (1973). LAW KF 10 S82.
Berger, Raoul. "Impeachment A. Bestor. A
Countercritique," 49 WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 255
(1973). LAW KF 10 W324.
Berger, Raoul. "Impeachment of Judges and 'good behavior' Tenure," 79 YALE
LAW JOURNAL 1475 (1970). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Berger, Raoul. "Impeachment for 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors'," 44 SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 395 (1971). LAW KF 10 S75.
Berger, Raoul. "President, Congress, and the
Courts," 83 YALE LAW JOURNAL 1111 (1974). LAW KF
10 Y18.
Blackmar, Charles B. "On the Removal of Judges: The Impeachment Trial of Samuel
Chase," 48 AMERICAN JUDICATURE SOCIETY JOURNAL 183 (1964). LAW KF 10 A53.
Brown, Wrisley, "The Impeachment of the Federal Judiciary," 26 HARVARD LAW
REVIEW 684 (1913). LAW KF 10 H34.
Clarke, M.V. "The Origin of Impeachment," in OXFORD ESSAYS IN MEDIEVAL
HISTORY (1934). OLIN DA 175 078.
Cotterrell, R.B.M. "Lessons of Impeachment, 124 NEW LAW JOURNAL 784 (1974). LAW K14 E84.
Dougherty, J. Hampden. "Inherent Limitations upon Impeachment," 23 YALE LAW
JOURNAL 60 (1913). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Dwight, Theodore. "Trial by Impeachment," 6 AMERICAN LAW REGISTER (N.S.) 257
(1867). LAW KF 10
Ethridge, George H. "Law of Impeachment," 8 MISSISSIPPI LAW JOURNAL 283
(1936). LAW KF 10 M67.
Falcon, Richard V. "High Crimes and Misdemeanors: How, Why, and When to Impeach a
President," IV MARYLAND LAW FORUM 49 (1974). LAW KF 292 M32 A78.
Feerick, John D. "Impeaching Federal Judges: A Study of the Constitutional
Provisions," 39 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 1 (1970). LAW KF 10 F71.
Fenton, Paul S. " The Scope of the Impeachment Power," 65 NORTHWESTERN
UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 719 (1970). LAW KF 10 N89.
Firmage, Edwin Brown. "Law of Presidential
Impeachment," 1973 UTAH LAW REVIEW 681 (1973).
LAW KF 10 U894.
Firmage, Edwin Brown. "Removal of the
President: Resignation and the Procedural Law of Impeachment." 1974 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1023 (1974) LAW KF 10 D875.
Frankel, Jack E. "Discipline and Removal of Judges," 38 FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL
1033 (1964). LAW KF 200 F63.
Gallo, Jon J. Note. "Removal of Federal Judges: New Alternatives to an Old
Problem," 13 UCLA LAW REVIEW 1385 (1966). LAW KF 10 U115.
Goldberg, Arthur .J. "Question of
Impeachment," 1 HASTINGS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
QUARTERLY 5 (1974). LAW KF 10 H348.
Gunther, Gerald. "Judicial Hegemony and
Legislative Autonomy: The Nixon (U.S. V. Nixon, 94 Sup. Ct. 3090) Case and the Impeachment
Process," 22 UCLA LAW REVIEW 30 (1974). LAW KF
10 U115.
Havighurst, Harold C. "Doing Away with
Presidential Impeachment: The Advantages of Parliamentary Government," 1974 ARIZONA STATE LAW JOURNAL 223 (1974). LAW KF 10
L3835.
Kramer, Robert, and Jerome A. Brown. "The Constitutionality of Removal and
Mandatory Procedures for the Federal Judiciary: The Meaning of 'During Good
Behavior'," 36 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 665 (1969). LAW KF 10 U652.
Kurland, Philip B. "Constitution and the Tenure of Federal Judges: Some Notes from
History," 35 GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 455 (1967). LAW KF 10 G34.
Kurland, Philip B. "Watergate, Impeachment
and the Constitution," 45 MISSISSIPPI LAW
JOURNAL 531 (1974). LAW KF 10 M67.
Lillich, Richard B. "The Chase Impeachment," 4 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL
HISTORY 49 (1960). LAW KF 10 A525.
Lydick, J.D. "Tyranny of Impeachment Procedure," 8 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW
REVIEW 257 (1930). LAW KF 10 N62.
McWhinney, Edward. "Congress and the
Presidency and the Impeachment Power," 7 INDIANA
LAW REVIEW 833 (1974). LAW KF 10 I393.
Morgan, Jr., Charles, Hope Eastman, Mary Ellen Gale, and Judith Areen. "Impeachment: An Historical Overview," 5 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 689 (1974). LAW KF 10 S48.
Nash, Michael L. "English Experience," 124 NEW LAW JOURNAL 223 (1974). LAW K14 E84.
Note. "Exclusiveness of the Impeachment Power under the Constitution," 51
HARVARD LAW REVIEW 330 (1937). LAW KF 10 H34.
O'Donovan, Vincent. "Impeachment,"
123 NEW LAW JOURNAL 572 (1973). LAW K14 E84.
Potts, C.S. "Impeachment as Remedy," 12 ST. LOUIS LAW REVIEW 15 (1926). LAW
KF 10 S146.
Rankin, R.S. "Is there a Time Limit for Impeachment?" 28 AMERICAN POLITICAL
SCIENCE REVIEW 866 (1934). LAW KF 10 A57.
Reinhardt, J.F. "Impeachment Proceedings Against Judge James Hawkins Peck,"
12 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CITY LAW REVIEW 106 (1944). LAW KF 10 U685.
Riddell, W.R. "Impeachment in England and English Colonies," 7 NEW YORK
UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 702 (1930). LAW KF 10 N62.
Ross, G.W. "'Good Behavior' of Federal Judges," 12 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CITY
LAW REVIEW 119 (1944). LAW KF 10 U685.
Sefton, James E. "The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson: A Century of Writing," 14 CIVIL WAR HISTORY 120 (1968). OLIN E461 C58.
Sloan, Jerome S. and Ira E. Garr. "Treason,
Bribery or Other High Crimes and Misdemeanors -- a Study of Impeachment," 47 TEMPLE LAW QUARTERLY 413 (1974). LAW KF 10 T28
Stolz, Preble. "Disciplining Federal Judges: Is Impeachment Hopeless?" 57
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 659 (1969). LAW KF 10 C14.
Ten Broek, Jacobus. "Partisan Politics and Federal Judgeship Impeachments Since
1903," 23 MINNESOTA UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 185 (1939). LAW KF 10 M66.
Thompson, Frank, and D.H. Pollitt. "Impeachment of Federal Judges: An Historical
Overview," 49 NORTH CAROLINA UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 87 (1970). LAW KF 10 N867.
Thompson, Fred D. "One Lawyer's Perspective on Watergate," 27 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW 226 (1974). LAW KF 10 O42.
Van Hecke, M.T. "Pardons In Impeachment Cases," 24 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 657
(1926). LAW KF 10 M62.
Van Valkenberg, William. Note. "God Save the
King from Overzealous Subordinates," 1974 UTAH
LAW REVIEW 71 (1974). LAW KF 10 U894.
Yankwich, Leon R. "Impeachment of Civil Officers under the Federal
Constitution," 26 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 849 (1938). LAW KF 10 G35.
Walthall, Timothy. Note. "Executive
Impeachment: Stealing Fire from the Gods," 9 NEW
ENGLAND LAW REVIEW 257 (1974). LAW KF 10 N51.
Wright, Fracis X. Note. "Trial of Presidential Impeachment: Should the Ghost be
Laid to Rest?" 44 NOTRE DAME LAWYER 1089 (1969). LAW KF 10 N91.
Ziskind, Martha. "Judicial Tenure in the American Constitution: English and
American Precedents," 1969 SUPREME COURT REVIEW 135(1969). LAW KF 10 S955.
1975-1998
Ackerman, Bruce. "Constitutional
Politics/Constitutional Law," 99 YALE LAW
JOURNAL, 453 (1989). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Amar, Akhil Reed & Neal Kumar Katyal. Commentary. "Executive Privileges and Immunities: the Nixon and
Clinton Cases," 108 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 701
(1995). LAW KF 10 H34.
Amar, Akhil Reed & Brian C. Kalt. "The
Presidential Privilege Against Prosecution," 2
NEXUS, JOURNAL OF OPINION 11 (1997). LAW KF 10 N73.
Auslander, Rose. Note. "Impeaching The
Senate's Use of Trial Committees," 67 NEW YORK
UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 68 (1992). LAW KF 10 N62.
Baker,Lynn A. Note. "Unnecessary and
Improper: The Judicial Councils Reform and Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980," 94 YALE LAW JOURNAL 1117 (1985). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Baron, Alan I. "The Curious Case of Alcee
Hastings," 19 NOVA LAW REVIEW 873 (1995). LAW KF
10 N93.
Barr, Bob. "High Crimes and Misdemeanors: the
Clinton-Gore Scandals and the Question of Impeachment,"
2 TEXAS REVIEW OF LAW AND POLITICS 1 (1997) LAW KF 10 T355.
Danielson, George E. "Presidential Immunity
from Criminal Prosecution," 63 GEORGETOWN LAW
JOURNAL 1065 (1975). LAW KF 10 G35.
Dick, Barrett. "Researcher's Guide to the 'Watergate
Affair',"
71 LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL 77, 266, 420 (1978). LAW Z 675 L2 L411.
Battisti, Frank J. "Independent Judiciary:
Or, an Evanescent Dream," 25 CASE WESTERN
RESERVE LAW REVIEW 711 (1975). LAW KF 10 C338.
Berger, Raoul. The Founders' Views -- According to Jefferson Powell. 67 TEXAS LAW
REVIEW 1033 (1989). LAW KF 10 T353.
Blum, Jennifer L. Comment. "How Much Process
Is Due: The Senate Impeachment Trial Process After Nixon V. United States," 44 CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 243 (1994). LAW KF
10 C37.
Blumoff, Theodore Y. "Illusions of
Constitutional Decisionmaking: Politics and the Tenure Powers in the Court," 73 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1079 (1988). LAW KF 10 I69.
Breker-Cooper, Steven. "The Appointments
Clause And The Removal Power: Theory And Seance,"
60 TENNESSEE LAW REVIEW 841 (1993). LAW KF 10 T29.
Broderick, Albert. "Citizen's Guide to Impeachment of a President: Problem Areas," 23 CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 205 (1973). LAW KF
10 C37.
Broyde, Michael J., "Expediting Impeachment:
Removing Article III Federal Judges After Criminal Conviction," 17 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY 157
(1994). LAW KF 10 H334.
Calabresi, Steven G. and Saikrishna B. Prakash. "The
President's Power To Execute the Laws," 104 YALE
LAW JOURNAL 541 (1994). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Calabresi, Steven G. and Christopher S. Yoo. "The
Removal Power: The Unitary Executive During the First Half-Century," 47 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 1451 (1997). LAW
KF 10 C338.
Carter, Stephen L. "The Political Aspects of
Judicial Power: Some Notes on The Presidential Immunity Decision," 131 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 1341
(1983). LAW KF 10 U71.
Carter, Stephen L. Comment. "The Supreme
Court, 1987 Term: The Independent Counsel Mess,"
102 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 105 (1988). LAW KF 10 H34.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. "Controlling Inherent
Presidential Power: Providing a Framework For Judicial Review," 56 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 863 (1983). LAW KF
10 S75.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. "A Paradox Without a
Principle: a Comment on The Burger Court's Jurisprudence in Separation of Powers Cases," 60 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 1083 (1987). LAW
KF 10 S75.
Clinton , Robert N. "A Mandatory View of
Federal Court Jurisdiction: a Guided Quest For The Original Understanding of Article III," 132 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 741
(1984). LAW KF 10 U71.
Currie, David P. "The Constitution in
Congress: The First Congress and the Structure of Government, 1789-1791," 2 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL ROUNDTABLE 161
(1995). LAW KF 10 U6535.
Cutler, Lloyd N. "The American Constitutional
Tradition of Shared And Separated Powers: Now Is The Time For All Good Men," 30 WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW 387 (1989). LAW KF
10 W71.
Dennis, David W. "Impeachment Revisited," 9 INDIANA LAW REVIEW 578 (1976). LAW KF 10 I393.
Easterbrook, Frank H. "Presidential Review," 40 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 905 (1990). LAW
KF 10 C338.
Eilberg, Joshua. "Investigation by the
Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives into the Charges of Impeachable
Conduct Against Richard M. Nixon," 48 TEMPLE LAW
QUARTERLY 209 (1975). LAW KF 10 T28.
Engdahl, David E. "John Marshall's 'Jeffersonian'
Concept of Judicial Review," 42 DUKE LAW JOURNAL
279 (1992). LAW KF 10 D875.
Fallon, Jr., Richard H. "Some Confusions
About Due Process, Judicial Review, And Constitutional Remedies," 93 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 309 (1993). LAW KF 10 C66.
Fitschen, Steven W. "Impeaching Federal
Judges: A Covenantal and Constitutional Response to Judicial Tyranny," 10 REGENT UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 111 (1998). LAW KF
10 R33.
Fitzgerald, Laura S. "Cadenced Power: The
Kinetic Constitution," 46 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 679
(1997). LAW KF 10 D875.
Fox, Brendan C. "The Justiciability of
Challenges to the Senate Rules of Procedure for Impeachment Trials," 60 GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 1275 (1992). LAW KF
10 G34.
Franklin, Mitchell. "Romanist Infamy and the
American Constitutional Conception of Impeachment,"
23 BUFFALO LAW REVIEW 313 (1975). LAW KF 10 B92.
Franklin, Mitchell. "Further Considerations
Relating to Romanist Infamy and the American Constitutional Conception of Impeachment," 24 Buffalo Law Review 29 (1975). LAW KF 10 B92.
Freedman, Eric M. "The Law as King and the
King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment?" 20 HASTINGS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUARTERLY 7 (1992).
LAW KF 10 H348.
Futterman, Stanley N. "Rules of Impeachment," 24 KANSAS LAW REVIEW 105 (1975). LAW KF 10 U675.
Gerhard, Casper. "The Constitutional
Organization of the Government," 26 WILLIAM
& MARY LAW REVIEW 177 (1985). LAW KF 10 W71.
Gerhardt, Michael J. "The Constitutional
Limits to Impeachment and its Alternatives," 68
TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1 (1989). LAW KF 10 T353.
Gerhardt, Michael J. "Rediscovering
Nonjusticiability: Judicial Review of Impeachments after Nixon," 44 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 231 (1994). LAW KF 10 D875.
Glennon, Michael J. "The Use of Custom in
Resolving Separation of Powers Disputes," 64
BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 109 (1984). LAW KF 10 B75.
Goldberg, Ira M. "Essay on Raoul Berger's Thesis for Judicial Intervention in the Process of
the Removal of the President of the United States,"
1975 WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW 414 (1975). LAW KF 10 W815.
Goodrich, Paul. Note. "Presidential
Impeachment -- Process, Problems and Proposals,"
1975 UTAH LAW REVIEW 199 (1975). LAW KF 10 U894.
Greenfield, Kent. "Original Penumbras:
Constitutional Interpretation in The First Year of Congress," 26 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW 79 (1993). LAW KF 10 C745.
Gunther, Gerald. "Congressional Power to
Curtail Federal Court Jurisdiction: An Opinionated Guide to the Ongoing Debate," 36 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 895 (1984). LAW KF 10 S82.
Gwyn, William B. "The Indeterminacy of the
Separation of Powers and the Federal Courts," 57
GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 474 (1989). LAW KF 10 G34.
Heflin. "The Impeachment Process: Modernizing
an Archaic System," 71 JUDICATURE 123 (1987).
LAW K 10 U21.
Howe, Scott W. "The Prospect of a President
Incarcerated," 2 NEXUS, A JOURNAL OF OPINION 86
(1997). LAW KF 10 N73.
Isenbergh, Joseph. Note. "Scope of the Power
to Impeach," 84 YALE LAW JOURNAL 1316 (1975).
LAW KF 10 Y18.
Jay, Stewart. "Origins of Federal Common Law:
Part One," 133 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW
REVIEW 1003 (1985). LAW KF 10 U71.
Jordan, Barbara. "Testimony Before the House
Judiciary Committee," 5 TEXAS JOURNAL OF WOMEN
AND THE LAW 161 (1996). LAW KF 10 T35.
Kainec, Lisa A. Comment. "Judicial Review of
Senate Impeachment Proceedings: Hands off Approach Appropriate?" 43 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 1499 (1993). LAW
KF 10 C338.
Kalt, Brian C. Note. "Pardon Me? The
Constitutional Case Against Presidential Self-Pardons,"
106 YALE LAW JOURNAL (1996). LAW KF 10 Y18.
King, Brett W. "The Use of Supermajority
Provisions in The Constitution: The Framers, The Federalist Papers And The Reinforcement
of a Fundamental Principle," 8 SETON HALL
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW JOURNAL 363 (1998). LAW KF 10 C754.
Lardiere, Eric. Comment. "The Justiciability
And Constitutionality of Political Intelligence Gathering," 30 UCLA LAW REVIEW 976 (1983). LAW KF 10 U115.
Lawson, Gary and Christopher D. Moore. "The
Executive Power of Constitutional Interpretation,"
81 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1267 (1996). LAW KF 10 I69.
Levinson, Sanford. "Constitutional
Protestantism in Theory and Practice: Two Questions for Michael Stokes Paulsen and One for
His Critics," 83 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 373
(1994). LAW KF 10 G35.
Lewittes, David I. "Constitutional Separation
of War Powers: Protecting Public And Private Liberty,"
57 BROOKLYN LAW REVIEW 1083 (1992). LAW KF 10 B914.
Linde, Hans A. "Replacing a President: Rx for
a 21st Century Watergate," 43 GEORGE
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 384 (1975). LAW KF 10 G34.
Long, Jennifer L. Note. "How to Sue the
President: A Proposal for Legislation Establishing the Extent of Presidential Immunity," 30 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 283 (1995). LAW
KF 10 V21.
Luchsinger, Daniel. "Committee Impeachment
Trials: The Best Solution?" 80 GEORGETOWN LAW
JOURNAL 163 (1991). LAW KF 10 G35.
Matraia, Michael T. NOTE: Running for Cover Behind Presidential Immunity: The Oval
Office as Safe Haven from Civil Suits. 29 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 195 (1995). LAW KF
10 S94.
Maxman, Melissa H. Note. "In Defense of the
Constitution's Judicial Impeachment Standard,"
86 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 420 (1987). LAW KF 10 62.
McNutt, Geoffrey M. and John F. Manning. "Formal
And Functional Approaches to Separation of Powers: The Political Cost of Checks And
Balances in Nixon v. United States And Morrison v. Olson," 2 GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 281 (1995). LAW
KF 10 G3395.
Melton, Jr. Buckner F. "Federal Impeachment
And Criminal Procedure: The Framers' Intent," 52
MARYLAND LAW REVIEW 437 (1993). LAW KF 10 M39.
Mezvinsky, Edward M. and Doris S. Freedman. "Federal
Income Tax Evasion as an Impeachable Offense,"
63 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 1071 (1975). LAW KF 10 G35.
Miller, Randall K. "The Collateral Matter
Doctrine: The Justiciability of Cases Regarding the Impeachment Process," 22 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 777 (1996).
LAW KF 10 O378.
Miller, Randall K. "Congressional Inquests:
Suffocating the Constitutional Prerogative of Executive Privilege," 81 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 631 (1997). LAW KF 10 M66.
Nagel, Robert F. "The American Constitutional
Tradition of Shared And Separated Powers: a Comment on The Rule of Law Model of Separation
of Powers," 30 WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW 355
(1989). LAW KF 10 W71.
Nolan, Beth. "Removing Conflicts from the
Administration of Justice: Conflicts of Interest and Independent Counsels Under the Ethics
in Government Act," 79 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 1
(1990). LAW KF 10 G35.
Nunn, Sam. "Judicial Tenure," 54 CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW 29 (1977). LAW KF 10 C52.
Peterson, Todd D. "The Role of the Executive
Branch in the Discipline and Removal of Federal Judges,"
1993 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 809 (1993). LAW KF 10 U67.
Pushaw, Jr., Robert J. "Justiciability And
Separation of Powers: a Neo-Federalist Approach,"
81 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 393 (1996). LAW KF 10 C81.
Raven-Hansen, Peter and William C. "From
Vietnam to Desert Shield: The Commander in Chief's Spending Power," 81 IOWA LAW REVIEW 79 (1995). LAW KF 10 I69.
Rehnquist, William H. "The American
Constitutional Experience: Remarks of the Chief Justice,"
54 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 1161 (1994). LAW KF 10 L885.
Rehnquist, William H. "The Impeachment
Clause: a Wild Card in The Constitution," 85
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 903 (1991). LAW KF 10 N887.
Rehnquist, William H. "Political Battles for
Judicial Independence," 50 WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW
835 (1975). LAW KF 10 W324.
Roberts, Clayton. "Law of Impeachment in
Stuart England: a Reply to Raoul Berger," 84
YALE LAW JOURNAL 1419 (1975). LAW KF 10 Y18.
Rodino, Jr., Peter W. "The Case For The
Independent Counsel," 19 SETON HALL LEGISLATIVE
JOURNAL 5 (1994). LAW KF 10 S49.
Rogers, E. Marby and Stephen B. Young. "Public
Office as a Public Trust: A Suggestion That Impeachment for High Crimes and Mistdemeanors
Implies a Fiduciary Standard," 63 GEORGETOWN LAW
JOURNAL 1025 (1975). LAW KF 10 G35.
Rosenbaum, Judith and David L. Lee. "Constitutional
Perspective on Judicial Tenure," 61 JUDICATURE
465 (1978). LAW KF 10 A53.
Rotunda, Ronald D. "An Essay on the
Constitutional Parameters of Federal Impeachment,"
76 KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL 707 (1988). LAW KF10 K 371.
Safirstein, Peter and Constance O'Keefe. Note. "
Fallen Angels, Separation of Powers, And The Saturday Night Massacre: an Examination of
The Practical, Constitutional, And Political Tensions in The Special Prosecutor Provisions
of The Ethics in Government Act," 49 BROOKLYN
LAW REVIEW 113 (1982). LAW KF 10 B914.
Sargentich, Thomas O. "The Limits of The
Parliamentary Critique of The Separation of Powers,"
34 WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW 679 (1993). LAW KF 10 W71.
Scarborough, Keith A. Note. 'Awful
Discretion': The Impeachment Experience in the
States," 55 NEBRASKA LAW REVIEW 91 (1975). LAW
KF 10 N38.
Schneider, Nicole H. Comment. "Senate
Impeachment Trials - to Review or Not to Review, What Would Marshall Do?" 4 SETON HALL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW JOURNAL 237 (1993).
LAW KF 10 C754.
Sears, Christopher James. "Student Work:
Clinton V. Jones: The King Has No Clothes (Nor Absolute Immunity to Boot)," 100 WEST VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 493 (1997). LAW KF 10
W52.
Shane, Peter M. "Who May Discipline or Remove
Federal Judges? A Constitutional Analysis," 142
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 209 (1993). LAW KF 10 U71.
Sidak, J. Gregory. "The President's Power of
the Purse," 47 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1162 (1989). LAW
KF 10 D875.
Siegel, Jonathan R. "Suing the President:
Nonstatutory Review Revisited," 97 COLUMBIA LAW
REVIEW 1612 (1997). LAW KF 10 C66.
Simon, Maria. Note. "Bribery and Other Not So
"Good Behavior": Criminal Prosecution as a Supplement to Impeachment of Federal
Judges," 94 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 1617 (1994). LAW
KF 10 C66.
SIXTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. "The Independent Counsel Process: Is It Broken and How
Should It Be Fixed?" 54 WASHINGTON & LEE LAW
REVIEW 1515 (1997). LAW KF 10 W32.
Smith, David Todd. Casenote. "Constitutional
Law--impeachment Trial Clause--a Claim That Senate Impeachment Rule XI Violates The
Impeachment Trial Clause Is a Nonjusticiable Political Question," 25 SAINT MARY'S LAW JOURNAL 855 (1994). LAW KF 10
S148.
Stern, Barry Jeffrey. "Revealing Misconduct
by Public Officials Through Grand Jury Reports,"
136 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 73 (1987). LAW KF 10 U71.
Sweeney, J.P. Comment. "Presidential
Impeachment and Judicial Review," 23 AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 959 (1975). LAW KF 10 A59.
Taylor, John A. Note. "Impeachment as Applied
to Executive Officers, Or, Can Congress Corner a Crooked Cabinet?" 15 NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW 160 (1979-80). LAW KF 10
N51.
Tocklin, Adrian M. "Pennoyer v. Neff: The
Hidden Agenda of Stephen J. Field," 28 SETON
HALL LAW REVIEW 75 (1997). LAW KF 10 LAW K14 E84.
Tuttle, Elbert P. and Dean W. Russell. "Symposium:
Separation of Powers: Preserving Judicial Integrity: Some Comments on the Role of the
Judiciary under the 'Blending' of Powers,"
37 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 587 (1988). LAW KF 10 J797.
Van Tassel, Emily Field. "Resignations And
Removals: a History of Federal Judicial Service--and Disservice--1789-1992," UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW 333 (1993).
LAW KF 10 U71.
Verkuil, Paul R. "The American Constitutional
Tradition of Shared And Separated Powers: Separation of Powers, The Rule of Law And The
Idea of Independence," 30 WILLIAM & MARY LAW
REVIEW 301 (1989). LAW KF 10 W71.
Walton, R. Brent. COMMENT. "We're No Angels:
Paula Corbin Jones v. William Jefferson Clinton,"
71 TULANE LAW REVIEW 897 (1997). LAW KF 10 T91.
Wilkinson III, J. Harvie. "The Role of Reason
in the Rule of Law," 56 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
LAW REVIEW 779 (1989). LAW KF U652.
Williams, Jr., Napoleon B. "Historical and
Constitutional Bases for the Senate's Power to
Use Masters or Committees to Receive Evidence in Impeachment," 50 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 512 (1975). LAW KF
10 N62.
Most sites presently available advocating Clinton impeachment are of limited scholarly
interest. One that may be an exception: http://www.house.gov/barr/i_.htm
Since this work was updated in July 1998, other relevant Internet sites have been
created. These sites were visisted Nov. 11, 1998. The special prosecutor's report may be
found on numerous sites, among them are official
sites: http://icreport.access.gpo.gov/index.html,
and commercial sites, e.g., http://www.boston.com/starr/.
ELECTRONIC DATABASES: Neither LEXIS nor WESTLAW has a database dedicated to the
developments in the possible impeachment of President Clinton, one may search in the
databases devoted to White House press releases, presidential documents, general political
and legislative news as well as general news databases.
INDEXES: INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS. LAW KF 8 I37 RR/REF.
Access is provided by subject, author, case name. Prior to 1943 Cf.
"Impeachment." Following 1943, Cf. "Constitutional Law: U.S. Construction,
Operation, and Enforcement of Constitutional Provisions."
CURRENT INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS. LAW KF 8 W31 RR/REF. Cf. "Constitutional
Law."
SUBJECT HEADINGS: In addition to "Impeachment," and "Constitutional
Law", it may be helpful to consult the following entries in the subject catalog of
Cornell Law Library: "Privileges and Immunities," "Recall and Review,"
"Government Immunity and Liability," "Judiciary," "President of
the United States."
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION NUMBERS: KF 4958 - Impeachment Power and Procedure;
KF 5075 - Impeachment: President: KF 8781-8782 - Impeachment: Federal Judges
The following paragraph, contained in the unupdated version of the guide, provides
suggestions on what names and sources to search for Watergate related information. One
should also look at the Washington Post's
website on Watergate for original articles and other information on Watergate:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/
watergate/front.htm
As President Clinton is presently undergoing an investigation, relevant news and
analysis may be found in analogous sources (THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, TIME,
NEWSWEEK, etc.).